techpunkMay 31, 2026, 9:37 AM
Medium Cable Winder found here https://makerworks3d.com/models/cmpttocst003cuktcipfgg4ss
3D
Storage Box for Portable Cable Organizer
Credited creator
@mladen88View source
Creator quality
72Proven
techpunk: 13 successful prints, 46% completion reliability, and 0 verified reviews.
Successful prints
13
Failure rate
0%
Verified reviews
0
Downloads
647
Container/Storage for the cable organizer/winder by squinn. This size fits 7 medium sized cable organizers
Material
PLA
File Type
3MF
Volume
155.78 cm^3
Printability checks
A buyer-facing manufacturability summary before checkout.
Use the quote configurator below to export the full PDF.
Printability score
86/100
Higher is easier to print repeatably.
Estimated failure risk
13% • Low
Lower is safer for first-pass production.
Support burden
14% likely
Likely manageable with lighter support settings.
Bed fit hint
207 mm max span
Orientation and machine selection may change if you scale it up.
Orientation: AI orientation optimizer: keep X as height to maximize Z×Y bed contact.
Fix suggestion: Minimal supports: use build-plate-only supports and prioritize clean surfaces.
Instant quote
Tune this model and save the configuration to your cart.
Use-case goals
Drive material recommendations with the actual part constraints.
Target dimensions (mm)
Colors (required)
Slot 1
#38cc0a
Estimated price
$23.46
Lead time: ...
Size: 80.3 x 207 x 84.2 mm
Standard tolerance
Print feasibility
71Needs Review
Printable, but setup choices and post-processing strategy still matter.
Geometry72
How stable the shape looks for repeatable printing.
Reliability68
Historical risk estimate converted into a confidence score.
Support60
Higher means less support cleanup and fewer fragile touchpoints.
Machine fit91
Penalizes larger spans that reduce bed/machine flexibility.
Material recommender
Tradeoff-aware suggestions based on durability, heat, UV, flexibility, and budget preferences.
PLA • current
Lower-cost optionClosest to current selection
Score
62
PETG
Lower-cost option
Score
46
ABS
Tradeoff option for performance requirements
Score
34
G-code import
Drop a slicer-exported G-code for a tighter estimate.
Parts breakdown
1 part
Comments
1 commentSign in to ask questions or share your experience.
Log in to comment